Petition to Revoke Vaccine Manufacturers' Legal Immunity & Ensure Full Transparency in Vaccine Safety

Addressed To:

• The United States Congress

• The President of the United States

• The United States Supreme Court

• The Department of Justice (DOJ)

• The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

• The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

• The National Institutes of Health (NIH)

• All State Legislatures & Governors

• All Vaccine Manufacturers, Including Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, and GlaxoSmithKline

• All Hospitals & Healthcare Providers Enforcing Mandatory Vaccination Policies

We, the undersigned, exercise our right to petition for redress of grievances under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, demanding the immediate revocation of legal immunity for vaccine manufacturers, full transparency in vaccine ingredients, and the right of parents to refuse any vaccine without coercion or legal retaliation. For decades, vaccine manufacturers have been shielded from liability under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (NCVIA), preventing families from seeking justice when their children suffer from vaccine-related injuries or death. This is a direct violation of the fundamental principles of accountability, informed consent, and parental rights.

Grievance:

The Unlawful Protection of Vaccine Manufacturers & Violation of Parental Rights

Parents across the nation—and the world—are facing the devastating consequences of vaccine-related injuries, often with no legal recourse against the manufacturers responsible. These injuries include:

1. Neurological damage, developmental delays, and autism spectrum disorders linked to toxic vaccine ingredients.

2. Adverse reactions, including seizures, autoimmune disorders, and sudden deaths.

3. The coercion of parents into vaccinating their newborns under the threat of losing custody of their children.

   
   

Under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986, vaccine manufacturers were granted immunity from lawsuits related to vaccine injuries. This violates the fundamental principle of accountability, as no other industry is granted such broad legal protection when their products harm individuals. If a car manufacturer knowingly sells a defective vehicle that causes harm, they can be sued. Why should vaccine manufacturers be exempt?

Many vaccines contain potentially harmful ingredients, including aluminum, mercury (thimerosal), formaldehyde, and polysorbate 80, which have been linked to neurological damage and autoimmune disorders. Dr. Paul Thomas's decade-long study found that unvaccinated children exhibited fewer chronic health conditions than vaccinated children, yet this data is suppressed. Parents have the right to full disclosure of all vaccine ingredients and their potential risks before making a decision.

Legal Standing:

Constitutional & Case Law Precedents

1.  The U.S. Constitution

The Fourth Amendment protects individuals from unlawful government intrusion into personal decisions, including medical choices. The Fifth Amendment ensures due process and equal protection under the law, which are violated when parents are coerced into vaccinating their children against their will. The Ninth Amendment reserves the rights of the people, including the right to make medical decisions without government coercion.

2.  The Nuremberg Code (1947)

The Nuremberg Code (1947) states that informed consent is an absolute requirement for medical interventions. Coercing parents into vaccinating their children under the threat of legal repercussions violates this principle and constitutes medical tyranny.

3.  Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905)

While often cited to justify vaccine mandates, this case actually established that medical decisions must balance public health with individual rights and cannot impose unreasonable harm.

4.  Doe v. Rumsfeld, 341 F. Supp. 2d 1 (2004)

Ruled that the government cannot force individuals to take an experimental vaccine without informed consent.

5.  Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC, 562 U.S. 223 (2011)

This case upheld vaccine manufacturers' immunity but also acknowledged the existence of vaccine injuries, proving the need for legal accountability.

6. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health, 497 U.S. 261 (1990)

Established that individuals have the right to refuse medical treatment, reinforcing bodily autonomy.

Redress of Grievance:

Our Demands

We, the People, demand immediate legislative action to ensure vaccine manufacturers are held accountable, parental rights are protected, and full transparency in vaccine safety is upheld.

1. Repeal the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) & Restore Manufacturer Liability

Vaccine manufacturers must be held legally accountable for injuries and deaths caused by their products. No other industry is allowed to escape liability—vaccine manufacturers should be no exception.

2. Implement Full Transparency in Vaccine Ingredients & Risks

Every vaccine package must include a complete list of ingredients, with independent studies confirming their safety. Parents must be provided with full disclosure of all risks before consenting to vaccination.

3. Protect Parental Rights to Refuse Vaccination Without Retaliation

No parent should face loss of custody, medical discrimination, or legal action for choosing not to vaccinate their child. The right to informed consent and medical freedom must be legally protected.

4. Launch an Independent Investigation Into Vaccine Safety & Long-Term Effects

A congressionally mandated investigation must be conducted into:

• The rise of autism, autoimmune disorders, and neurological conditions linked to vaccination.

• The suppression of studies proving vaccine harm.

• The role of the CDC, FDA, and WHO in concealing vaccine-related injuries.

5. Hold Hospitals & Medical Institutions Accountable for Coercion

Hospitals must be prohibited from forcing vaccinations on newborns and infants without parental consent. Any institution found violating parental rights must be held legally accountable.

Affirmation:

By signing below, I affirm and declare that I am a living man or woman of sound mind, acting of my own free will.

I have read and understand the contents of this petition, and I sign it knowingly, willingly, and without coercion.

I understand that this petition is a lawful expression of the People’s right to petition for redress of grievances, and I add my signature as evidence of support and standing for the actions, remedies, and demands stated above.

I reserve all of my unalienable rights, waive none, and stand in honor, peace, and truth.